Reward allocation, also known as the credit assignment problem, has been an important topic ineconomics, engineering, andmachine learning.

A recent line of work has established uncoupled learning dynamics such that, when employed by all players in a game, each player's regret after T repetitions grows polylogarithmically in T, an exponential improvement over the traditional guarantees within the no-regret framework. However, so far these results have only been limited to certain classes of games with structured strategy spaces--such as normal-form and extensive-form games. The question as to whether O(polylogT) regret bounds can be obtained for general convex and compact strategy sets--which occur in many fundamental models in economics and multiagent systems--while retaining efficient strategy updates is an importantquestion.

We introduce Cautious Optimism, a framework for substantially faster regularized learning in general games. Cautious Optimism, as a variant of Optimism, adaptively controls the learning pace in a dynamic, non-monotone manner to accelerate no-regret learning dynamics. Cautious Optimism takes as input any instance of Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) and outputs an accelerated no-regret learning algorithm (COFTRL) by pacing the underlying FTRL with minimal computational overhead. Importantly, it retains uncoupledness, that is, learners do not need to know other players' utilities. Cautious Optimistic FTRL (COFTRL) achieves near-optimal $O_T(\log T)$ regret in diverse self-play (mixing and matching regularizers) while preserving the optimal $O_T(\sqrt{T})$ regret in adversarial scenarios. In contrast to prior works (e.g., Syrgkanis et al. [2015], Daskalakis et al. [2021]), our analysis does not rely on monotonic step sizes, showcasing a novel route for fast learning in general games. Moreover, instances of COFTRL achieve new state-of-the-art regret minimization guarantees in general convex games, exponentially improving the dependence on the dimension of the action space $d$ over previous works [Farina et al., 2022a].

Learning and computation of equilibria are central problems in game theory, theory of computation, and artificial intelligence. In this work, we introduce proximal regret, a new notion of regret based on proximal operators that lies strictly between external and swap regret. When every player employs a no-proximal-regret algorithm in a general convex game, the empirical distribution of play converges to proximal correlated equilibria (PCE), a refinement of coarse correlated equilibria. Our framework unifies several emerging notions in online learning and game theory-such as gradient equilibrium and semicoarse correlated equilibrium-and introduces new ones. Our main result shows that the classic Online Gradient Descent (GD) algorithm achieves an optimal $O(\sqrt{T})$ bound on proximal regret, revealing that GD, without modification, minimizes a stronger regret notion than external regret. This provides a new explanation for the empirically superior performance of gradient descent in online learning and games. We further extend our analysis to Mirror Descent in the Bregman setting and to Optimistic Gradient Descent, which yields faster convergence in smooth convex games.

Reward allocation, also known as the credit assignment problem, has been an important topic in economics, engineering, and machine learning.

Reward allocation, also known as the credit assignment problem, has been an important topic in economics, engineering, and machine learning. An important concept in credit assignment is the core, which is the set of stable allocations where no agent has the motivation to deviate from the grand coalition. In this paper, we consider the stable allocation learning problem of stochastic cooperative games, where the reward function is characterised as a random variable with an unknown distribution. Given an oracle that returns a stochastic reward for an enquired coalition each round, our goal is to learn the expected core, that is, the set of allocations that are stable in expectation. Within the class of strictly convex games, we present an algorithm named \texttt{Common-Points-Picking} that returns a stable allocation given a polynomial number of samples, with high probability. The analysis of our algorithm involves the development of several new results in convex geometry, including an extension of the separation hyperplane theorem for multiple convex sets, and may be of independent interest.

Domain generalization (DG) tends to alleviate the poor generalization capability of deep neural networks by learning model with multiple source domains. A classical solution to DG is domain augmentation, the common belief of which is that diversifying source domains will be conducive to the out-of-distribution generalization. However, these claims are understood intuitively, rather than mathematically. Our explorations empirically reveal that the correlation between model generalization and the diversity of domains may be not strictly positive, which limits the effectiveness of domain augmentation. This work therefore aim to guarantee and further enhance the validity of this strand. To this end, we propose a new perspective on DG that recasts it as a convex game between domains. We first encourage each diversified domain to enhance model generalization by elaborately designing a regularization term based on supermodularity. Meanwhile, a sample filter is constructed to eliminate low-quality samples, thereby avoiding the impact of potentially harmful information. Our framework presents a new avenue for the formal analysis of DG, heuristic analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate the rationality and effectiveness.

We consider risk-averse learning in repeated unknown games where the goal of the agents is to minimize their individual risk of incurring significantly high cost. Specifically, the agents use the conditional value at risk (CVaR) as a risk measure and rely on bandit feedback in the form of the cost values of the selected actions at every episode to estimate their CVaR values and update their actions. A major challenge in using bandit feedback to estimate CVaR is that the agents can only access their own cost values, which, however, depend on the actions of all agents. To address this challenge, we propose a new risk-averse learning algorithm with momentum that utilizes the full historical information on the cost values. We show that this algorithm achieves sub-linear regret and matches the best known algorithms in the literature. We provide numerical experiments for a Cournot game that show that our method outperforms existing methods.